If Durga Actually Came Down to Calcutta

Audio article

Uses the speech voice supplied by your browser or device.

Let me tell you what would happen if Durga actually descended onto the streets of Calcutta during her own festival. Not the clay version. Not the metaphor. Not the exquisitely painted face with the LED halo and the sponsor logo tastefully positioned somewhere near the left armpit. I mean the actual goddess. The one with ten arms and a lion and a temper born, according to the old story, from the pooled fury and radiance of gods who had discovered that the buffalo demon they could not defeat was apparently going to require a woman.

Her.

In person.

Walking down Rashbehari Avenue at eleven at night on Ashtami, past the queues, past the phuchka stalls, past the man selling glow-stick tridents that will be in a garbage bin by Dashami morning.

She would not be alarmed by the crowds. She has seen armies. She has seen armies the way you and I have seen traffic. She would not be alarmed by the noise. She arrives armed with half the celestial arsenal, for Vishnu’s sake. Noise is practically her entrance music. The traffic might test her, I grant you. Even divinity has not yet discovered a painless way of getting across Calcutta during Puja without developing a nervous tic.

But that is not what would disturb her.

What would disturb her is the gap.

The canyon.

The Mariana Trench of hypocrisy separating what we say we worship from how we actually behave.

For five glorious days this city calls her Ma.

Ma.

The word is everywhere. Printed on banners, blasted through loudspeakers, painted onto hoardings, whispered with tears by men who will shove an elderly woman aside to reach the pandal barricade thirty seconds faster. We worship Shakti in public and ration it in private as though female autonomy were kerosene under the Public Distribution System and the women had already exceeded their monthly quota.

She is invoked as the destroyer of evil. But evil, in lived experience, is inconveniently bureaucratic. It does not usually arrive as a buffalo demon holding a sword and announcing itself with a roar.

It arrives as a bribe.

A backhand.

A dowry demand disguised as family expectation.

A husband who folds his hands before the goddess and then goes home and tells his wife whom she may meet, where she may go, what she may wear, and whether she may visit her own parents without permission.

A boss who sponsors a pandal, poses beneath the lights for photographs, talks solemnly about women’s empowerment, and somehow still finds perfectly respectable market reasons to pay women less, promote them less, interrupt them more, and call the whole arrangement meritocracy.

A local strongman who organizes the immersion procession, leads the chanting, touches the goddess’s feet, and later explains to somebody in the neighborhood exactly what happens to people who displease the wrong men.

None of these make photogenic demons.

They are too ordinary.

Too useful.

Too well connected.

They are committed by people who also bow before the goddess. Who also fast on Ashtami. Who also write “Ma aschen” on Facebook beneath folded hands and hibiscus flowers, then return without noticeable spiritual whiplash to whatever petty cruelty was waiting in the next room.

Clay does not interrupt us.

Clay does not ask follow-up questions.

Clay does not say: you touched my feet this morning and cheated your employee this afternoon, you magnificent pile of ceremonial devotion.

An actual Durga would collapse the comfortable distance between symbolism and behavior, and that collapse would be catastrophic for our self-image.

And then there is the consumerism.

Oh, the consumerism.

The glorious, fluorescent, unhinged retail blood-orgy of it all.

A goddess associated with protection, power, the defeat of Mahishasura and the restoration of order descends into a festival increasingly wallpapered with corporate logos, clothing discounts, restaurant offers, influencer reels, jewelry promotions, electronics sales, apartment advertisements, credit-card offers and a carefully manufactured panic that if you have not purchased three new outfits before Saptami you are essentially an enemy of Bengali civilization.

When did worship become a retail season?

When did devotion acquire a QR code?

Families borrow money to perform prosperity. Neighborhoods compete over spectacle the way peacocks compete over tail feathers, except peacocks have so far resisted consumer credit. People photograph the idol more attentively than they look at the person standing beside them. Cameras rise like a second forest of hands. The poor watch wealth parade past in LEDs and imported lighting equipment, and we congratulate ourselves on inclusiveness because nobody has technically charged them admission for looking.

Do not misunderstand me.

There is nothing wrong with celebration.

Clothes, food, decoration, craftsmanship, music, crowds, flirtation, adda, pandal-hopping, ridiculous quantities of fried food, children staying awake long past any defensible bedtime—these are not moral failures. A civilization without festivals would be a municipal office under fluorescent tubes with a plastic chair missing one leg.

Joy is not the problem.

Beauty is not the problem.

Commerce itself is not the problem.

The problem begins somewhere between devotion and display, when the logic curdles and prosperity becomes theatre. We perform abundance while living with precarity. We build elaborate shelters for the goddess and fail to make the street outside reliably safe for women. We spend months preparing for the mother’s arrival and sometimes leave our own mothers sitting alone, waiting for a phone call, while we arrive eventually with fruit, sweets and the apologetic choreography of people who know perfectly well what they have neglected.

If Durga came down and walked through Calcutta during her own festival, she would see daughters worshipped symbolically and controlled practically.

Women praised as goddesses when obedient and called considerably less divine things when inconvenient.

The hungry standing outside restaurants serving festival thalis whose prices might cover several ordinary meals.

Children moving through traffic selling balloons beneath advertisements for luxury apartments promising lifestyles none of the people underneath the billboard are expected to inhabit.

Devotion coexisting with cruelty as comfortably as milk with tea because ritual has been assigned a separate moral account—a protected ledger into which five days of incense, flowers, anjali and enthusiasm can apparently be deposited without requiring withdrawals from the account marked DAILY CONDUCT.

Home.

We say Ma has come home.

Home to what, precisely?

To a city where the feminine can be divine for five days and domesticated for the remaining three hundred and sixty?

Where we require a ten-armed goddess to remind us that women possess power because ordinary women possessing two arms and an opinion is apparently still considered excessive equipment?

That is perhaps the great convenience of the idol—and I say this as someone who loves the festival with a ferocity that embarrasses me.

The idol is clay.

Clay absorbs contradiction without complaint.

Clay permits us to perform virtue without practicing it.

Clay is the perfect witness: silent, beautiful, and utterly incapable of asking what happened after the dhak stopped.

An actual Durga would not be silent.

She would ask whether reverence for the feminine counts if it expires at the pandal gate.

Whether charity counts when the people working for you cannot live on what you pay them.

Whether piety survives corruption.

Whether touching the goddess’s feet means anything if your boot remains planted on somebody else’s neck.

Whether a civilization can keep performing virtue ceremonially while outsourcing vice to ordinary life, the way we outsource everything else we find unpleasant.

And Calcutta, which has never in its recorded history been short of an answer, would respond with a committee.

There would be a press conference.

Someone would demand to know which political party she supports.

Someone else would accuse her of insulting Bengali culture.

A television panel would assemble six men, one shouting woman, a retired bureaucrat, a priest nobody had heard of before breakfast and a constitutional expert whose microphone would mysteriously stop working.

The question on screen would read:

HAS DURGA GONE TOO FAR?

Another channel would ask whether the goddess had become anti-Hindu.

A luxury brand would offer her an endorsement contract.

An app would announce priority darshan of the actual goddess for premium subscribers.

A restaurant would launch the Mahishasura Mutton Platter, limited time only, bookings open.

By lunchtime there would be merchandise.

By evening there would be hashtags.

#DurgaSpeaks.

#NotMyGoddess.

#BoycottDurga.

#IStandWithMahishasura.

Someone would inevitably launch a podcast.

This is not an argument against Durga Puja.

It is almost the opposite.

The festival is powerful because its symbolism is so enormous, so magnificent, so cosmically oversized that it dwarfs our everyday pettiness and forces us, for a few days, to imagine life at a larger scale.

A mother comes home.

A demon is confronted.

Power takes female form.

Family gathers.

The city transforms.

Art erupts from bamboo, cloth, clay, paint, light and the labor of thousands of hands. Streets that spend the year being merely streets become theatres. Strangers walk together after midnight. People eat, dress, visit, remember, flirt, pray, complain about queues and briefly, gloriously, behave as though the world is worth decorating because perhaps it is still worth saving.

That is why the contradiction matters.

Large symbols are dangerous precisely because they expose small behavior.

The brighter the light, the sharper the shadow.

If Durga came down to Calcutta in person, I doubt imperfect devotion would surprise her. Humanity has presumably been supplying the divine with imperfect devotion since the invention of humanity.

What might trouble her is how easily we confuse devotion with decoration.

How confidently we assume the goddess must approve of us because we have built her a beautiful stage.

How readily we outsource courage to an idol, compassion to a donation box, equality to a slogan and morality to five days in October.

She might look at the stage.

Then at the city.

Then at the stage again.

And she might say something that no clay idol has ever said and no committee would ever want entered into the minutes.

Something like:

I did not come here to be looked at.

I came here to be lived.

And then she would leave, and we would go back to photographing her absence.