The Foam at the Corner

By Published
Audio article

Uses the speech voice supplied by your browser or device.

Intricate sepia-toned line drawing of many weary faces tangled in dark looping strokes above a seated man

The future of work, they say, is bright. The future of work, they say, is flexible. The future of work, they say, is hybrid, agile, synergistic, a beautiful mosaic of human potential and algorithmic precision. The future of work, they say, is whatever the LinkedIn prophets of the algorithmic rapture are selling this quarter, their teeth gleaming like freshly polished tombstones, their enthusiasm as synthetic and unconvincing as a politician’s apology.

I have seen the future of work, and it is a man in a Calcutta call center at three in the morning, staring at a screen that tells him his job has been deprecated, his skills have been obsoleted, his value has been algorithmically determined to be less than the electricity cost of the server that now performs his function. I have seen the future of work, and it is a woman in a San Antonio medical billing office, fifteen years of institutional knowledge compressed into a training dataset, her expertise now a ghost in the machine, her paycheck now a severance package, her dignity now a LinkedIn post about “exciting new opportunities in the AI economy.”

The foam accumulates at the corner. The foam of desperation, the foam of rage, the foam of that particular kind of helpless laughter that bubbles up when you realize the game was rigged from the start and you were the mark, the patsy, the useful idiot who believed the meritocracy fairy tale, who swallowed the productivity gospel, who danced the dance and sang the song and now finds the music has stopped and the chairs have been removed by a chatbot.

It starts as a trickle, as these things always do. A trickle of anxiety, a trickle of sleepless nights, a trickle of that hollow feeling in the chest when you read another article about how GPT-7 just passed the bar exam and the medical boards and the engineering certification and the sommelier test and the emotional intelligence assessment and the Turing test and the Voight-Kampff test and whatever other benchmark the AI researchers have conjured to measure the immeasurable. A trickle of quiet panic, of checking your bank balance with the frequency of a hypochondriac checking their pulse, of updating your resume with the desperate energy of a drowning man waving at a passing ship that turns out to be a hologram.

Then the trickle becomes a stream. The stream becomes a river. The river becomes a flood. The flood becomes a plague, a pandemic of the psyche, a contagion of futility that spreads through the population like a virus with an R-naught of despair. The normies, the happy campers, the ones who never knew the black dog’s bite, who never felt the weight of existential dread pressing down on their chest like a stone, who never understood why someone would stare at a ceiling fan at four in the morning wondering if the rope would hold their weight—they will come to know. They will come to understand. They will join the ranks of the walking wounded, the chemically cushioned, the therapized and medicated and mindfulness-apped masses who have been fighting this war for years while the world told them to just think positive, just hustle harder, just learn to code, just adapt, just evolve, just become something other than what you are because what you are is no longer sufficient, no longer necessary, no longer economically viable.

The Gini coefficient, that elegant mathematical measure of inequality, that G=i=1nj=1nxixj2n2xˉG = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n} \sum_{j=1}^{n} |x_i - x_j|}{2n^2 \bar{x}} which tells us how thoroughly we have fucked the distribution of wealth, has been climbing like a fever chart for decades. The K-shaped economy, that grotesque bifurcation where the ascendant soar and the descending plummet, has been fueling a slow-burning rage, a resentment that smolders in the breast of the precariat, the gig workers, the contract laborers, the adjunct professors and underemployed lawyers and overqualified baristas who were promised a middle-class life and delivered a subscription-service existence. And now, now, the technologists arrive with their large language models and their neural networks and their transformer architectures and their attention mechanisms and their scaling laws, promising liberation while delivering liquidation, promising augmentation while delivering replacement, promising a future of leisure while delivering a present of obsolescence.

The burnout of bullshit jobs, that peculiar modern affliction where the soul dies a little each day in the performance of meaningless tasks, where David Graeber’s anthropological insight that millions of us are employed in occupations that even the occupants cannot justify, where the psychic toll of pretending to work while knowing your work serves no purpose, where this particular form of spiritual necrosis has been eating away at the collective psyche like a cancer. And now the machines arrive to automate the bullshit, to perform the performance, to simulate the simulation, and the bullshit workers find themselves not liberated but discarded, not freed but fired, their bullshit jobs revealed to have been not even bullshit enough to require a human presence.

The techno-feudal caste system, that emerging hierarchy of platform owners and platform dependents, of data lords and data serfs, of those who own the algorithms and those who are owned by them, has been constructing its architecture in plain sight, its digital manorialism disguised as innovation, its extractive economics dressed in the language of disruption. The gig economy was the apprenticeship, the platform economy was the journeyman stage, and now the AI economy is the masterwork, the final consolidation of power into the hands of those who control the silicon synapses, the neural networks, the training data, the compute clusters, the API keys to the kingdom.

And the mental health, oh the mental health, that fragile ecosystem of neurotransmitters and coping mechanisms and pharmaceutical interventions and therapeutic modalities and mindfulness practices and self-care routines and resilience training and grit cultivation and positive psychology and cognitive behavioral therapy and dialectical behavior therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy and every other acronymed attempt to patch the leaking vessel of the human psyche while the economic system drills holes in the hull with the enthusiasm of a pirate searching for treasure. The mental health that was already fraying, already threadbare, already held together with duct tape and hope and the occasional benzodiazepine, now faces the additional stressor of obsolescence, of irrelevance, of being told by the cold calculus of capital that your skills, your knowledge, your years of study and practice and sacrifice, your very capacity for meaningful contribution, has been priced out of the market by a statistical model that consumes electricity and excretes text.

The etymology of the word “robot” is instructive here, from the Czech “robota” meaning forced labor, drudgery, servitude, the word coined by Karel Čapek in his 1920 play R.U.R. where artificial workers revolt against their human creators. We have named our replacements after the very concept of slavery, and now we find ourselves the slaves to the slaves, serving the machines that serve the masters, our labor devalued, our agency diminished, our futures foreclosed. The word “automation” itself derives from the Greek “automatos” meaning self-acting, self-moving, that which acts of its own accord, and now we watch as the self-acting systems act upon us, moving us out of the way, rendering us obsolete with the implacable logic of exponential improvement.

I have bipolar type II, that particular flavor of mood disorder where the highs are hypomanic and the lows are depressive and the in-betweens are a kind of exhausted normalcy punctuated by the occasional mixed episode where anxiety and agitation perform their unholy matrimony. I know the terrain of despair, I have walked its valleys, I have camped in its caves, I have learned to navigate by the stars of pharmaceutical intervention and therapeutic insight. But I also know that the despair that comes from within, from the neurochemical weather patterns of a misfiring brain, is different from the despair that comes from without, from the structural violence of an economic system that treats human beings as depreciating assets, as costs to be minimized, as variables in an optimization function.

And I know, with the certainty of someone who has learned to read the signs, to interpret the auguries, to divine the future in the entrails of the present, that the plague is coming. Not a plague of bacteria or virus, not a plague of locusts or frogs, but a plague of the spirit, a pandemic of purposelessness, an epidemic of existential uselessness that will sweep through the population like a wildfire through dry grass. First the trickle, the early adopters of despair, the canaries in the coal mine who have already felt the tremors, who have already seen the writing on the wall, who have already begun the process of psychological adjustment to a world that no longer needs them. Then the stream, the widening circle of those who thought themselves safe, who believed their professions immune, their skills irreplaceable, their value self-evident, now confronted with the cold reality of algorithmic competence. Then the river, the flood, the deluge, the moment when the dam breaks and the collective psyche of a civilization confronts the possibility that the majority of its members may have no economically productive role to play in the emerging order.

The LinkedIn grinners, the YouTube cheerleaders, the podcast prophets, the conference circuit evangelists, the venture capitalists with their portfolios of human obsolescence, the tech bros with their scaling laws and their emergent capabilities and their artificial general intelligence timelines, they will continue to sell the future like snake oil merchants at a county fair, their enthusiasm as genuine as a three-dollar bill, their optimism as well-reasoned as a horoscope, their predictions as reliable as a politician’s promise. They will tell us that new jobs will be created, that human ingenuity will find new frontiers, that the Luddites were wrong and the Luddites will be wrong again, that this time is different because this time is always different until it isn’t, until the historical rhyme becomes a historical repetition, until the pattern completes itself with the inevitability of a Greek tragedy.

And the foam will accumulate, at the corner of the mouth, at the edge of the eye, at the boundary between sanity and its opposite, between hope and its absence, between the will to continue and the desire to simply stop. The foam of rage, the foam of grief, the foam of that particular kind of laughter that is indistinguishable from a scream, the foam of the body reacting to a mind that has been told, in no uncertain terms, that it is no longer required, no longer valued, no longer part of the equation that determines who eats and who starves, who thrives and who merely survives, who matters and who is matter to be processed, optimized, and ultimately, deleted.

Work, I assume, will never be the same again. In a very unhappy, morbid way. The meaning we derived from it, the identity we constructed around it, the social fabric we wove through it, the purpose we found in the doing of things that needed doing, the dignity of the craft, the pride of the skill, the satisfaction of the well-executed task—all of it now subject to the caprice of attention mechanisms and gradient descent, of loss functions and training epochs, of parameters in the billions and datasets in the trillions of tokens.

The future is not bright. The future is not flexible. The future is not hybrid or agile or synergistic. The future is a man in Calcutta, or a woman in San Antonio, or a person in any city of any country on any continent, staring at a screen that tells them their economic value has been calculated and found wanting, their skills have been benchmarked and found deficient, their human capital has been depreciated to zero, their future has been forecast and found bleak.

And the foam accumulates. The foam at the corner. The foam of the end of the world as we knew it, and we do not feel fine, we do not feel fine at all.


P.S. References: Čapek, Karel. R.U.R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots). 1920. Graeber, David. Bullshit Jobs: A Theory. 2018. Piketty, Thomas. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. 2014. Various Gini coefficient calculations from World Bank Open Data. The DSM-5 for bipolar II disorder specifications. Every LinkedIn post ever written by a venture capitalist.

Word Cloud

Word cloud for The Foam at the Corner